Decision-Making for Project Delivery System in Construction Projects Based on SWARA-TOPSIS Methods

Main Article Content

Mohammed Neamah Ahmed
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3112-4228
Gafel Kareem Aswed
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2198-5801
Hussein Ali Mohammed
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1706-1438

Abstract

The owner of construction projects often faces difficulty choosing the appropriate project delivery system. The construction project’s owner must choose a suitable project delivery system throughout the project's early decision-making stages. This choice greatly impacts the success of the project. This paper aims to construct a method for project delivery decisions. This method can provide a reference for the owner to select the proper project delivery system. This research described the factors affecting the decision about the project delivery method through a literature review. These factors were categorized into eight groups: scope, time, quality, cost, risk and relationships, owner organization, project characteristics, and external environmental factors. Then, a combined methodology of Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are proposed for project delivery system selection. The SWARA is used to determine the factors’ weights. The TOPSIS technique determines the rank of the alternatives proposed for the delivery system in the various categories. The results showed the most significant factors related to the cost with a weight of 0.335, and the design-build is the closest to the ideal solution and ranked first among the other suggested project delivery systems with a relative closeness of 0.829. This paper stipulates the basis for such a process of decision-making.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Korkmaz MS, Swarup L, Riley D. Delivering Sustainable, High-Performance Buildings: Influence of Project Delivery Methods on Integration and Project Outcomes. Journal of Management in Engineering 2013; 29(1): 71–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000114

Moon H, Cho K, Hong T, Hyun C. Selection Model for Delivery Methods for Multifamily-Housing Construction Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering 2011; 27(2):106–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000038

Liu B, Fu M, Shen G, Tai S, Zhang S. Research on Factors Influencing Project Delivery System Selection for Construction Projects. International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management 2017 November 10-12; Guangzhou, China. American Society of Civil Engineers: P. 292-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481080.033

Liu B, Huo T, Liang Y, Sun Y, Hu X. Key Factors of Project Characteristics Affecting Project Delivery System Decision Making in the Chinese Construction Industry: Case Study Using Chinese Data Based on Rough Set Theory. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 2016; 142(4): 1943-1953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000278

Seyedkolaei AA, Seno SA. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Controller Placement in Software-Defined Wide-Area Networks. The Journal of Supercomputing 2021; 77(11): 13447–13473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-021-03815-3

Ali NF, Mansor MA. Specify the Priorities of Indicators for Measuring the Performance Success of Construction Projects. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences 2022; 29(1): 36-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.29.1.4

Azhar N, Kang Y, Ahmad IU. Factors Influencing Integrated Project Delivery in Publicly Owned Construction Projects: An Information Modelling Perspective. Procedia Engineering 2014; 77(19): 213–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.019

Martin H, Lewis TM, Petersen A. Factors Affecting the Choice of Construction Project Delivery in Developing Oil and Gas Economies. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 2016; 12(3):170–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2016.1151762

Zhu X, Meng X, Chen Y. A Novel Decision-Making Model for Selecting a Construction Project Delivery System. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 2020; 26(7): 635–650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12915

Tamur ST, Erzaij KR. Selecting Appropriate Delivery System for Implementation of Green Buildings. Second International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering 2021 June 22-23; Akre, Duhok, Iraq. EDP Sciences: P. 1-11.

Mahdi IM, Alreshaid K. Decision Support System for Selecting the Proper Project Delivery Method Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). International Journal of Project Management 2005; 23(7): 564–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.007

Karabasevic D, Stanujkic D, Urosevic S. The MCDM Model for Personnel Selection Based on SWARA and ARAS Methods. Management - Journal for Theory and Practice of Management 2015; 20(77): 43–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2015.0029

Brahmi H, Moalla TL. A New Multicriteria Decision Support Tool Based on Fuzzy SWARA and TOPSIS. Multiple Criteria Decision Making 2021; 16(1): 5–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22367/mcdm.2021.16.01

Vrtagić S, Softić E, Subotić M, Stević Ž, Dordevic M, Ponjavic M. Ranking Road Sections Based on MCDM Model: New Improved Fuzzy SWARA (IMF SWARA). Axioms 2021; 10(2): 92-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10020092

Hashemkhani SZ, Görçün ÖF, Küçükönder H. Evaluating Logistics Villages in Turkey Using Hybrid Improved Fuzzy Swara (IMF SWARA) and Fuzzy MABAC Techniques. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 2021; 27(6): 1582–1612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.16004

Tiwari A, Lohani QM, Muhuri PK. Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Supplier Selection Problem. IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) 2020 July 19-24; Glasgow, United Kingdom. IEEE: P.1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ48607.2020.9177852

Su L, Li H, Cao Y, Lv L. Project Delivery System Decision Making Using Pythagorean Fuzzy TOPSIS. Engineering Economics 2019; 30(4): 461–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.30.4.22041

Febrian TB, Simangunsong A. Decision Support System Employee Performance Appraisal Method Using TOPSIS. Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High-Performance Computing 2020; 2(2): 307–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47709/cnapc.v2i2.412

Zheng F, Lin YC. A Fuzzy TOPSIS Expert System Based on Neural Networks for New Product Design. International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI) 2017 May 13-17; Sapporo, Japan. IEEE: P.3929-3939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASI.2017.7988494

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.