Surface Response Optimization for Absorption of CO2 Bubbles in Sweetener Solution by the Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer Operation
الشريط الجانبي للمقالة
محتوى المقالة الرئيسي
الملخص
There is a trend to produce soft drinks with new specifications by increasing the amount of carbon dioxide absorbed in them but within the permissible food specifications limits. The experimental investigation of physical absorption was conducted in a bubble column to determine carbon dioxide absorption yield (YCO2) and volumetric mass transfer coefficients (Kla) to the liquid phase. The aim was to quantify the impact and optimization of the gas diffuser pore size, absorbent solution's temperature, gas flow rate, sucrose concentration, and their interaction on the responses of YCO2 and Kla. Box-Behnken design (BBD) in response surface methodology (RSM) is selected to determine this relationship. The Pareto chart was used to determine the experimental variables significantly impacting the observed responses. According to the analysis of variance (ANOVA), the absorbent solution's temperature, gas diffuser pore size, and sucrose concentration were important process variables that affect the absorption yield of carbon dioxide. All variables with interactions were found to affect volumetric mass transfer coefficients. The optimal responses for maximum YCO2 and Kla were 49.2 % and 0.455 1/min, respectively. The operational conditions were as follows: pore size of the diffuser (0.5 μm), gas flow rate (0.68 L/min), the temperature of absorbent (5 °C), and sucrose concentration (150 g/L).
تفاصيل المقالة
القسم
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
المراجع
Kregiel D. Health Safety of Soft Drinks: Contents, Containers, and Microorganisms. BioMed Research International 2015; 2015: 1–15.
Kraakman NJR, Rocha-Rios J, van Loosdrecht MCM. Review of mass transfer aspects for biological gas treatment. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2011; 91(4): 873–886.
Elhajj J, Al-Hindi M, Azizi F. Review of the Absorption and Desorption Processes of Carbon Dioxide in Water Systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2013; 53(1): 2–22.
Sieblist C, Jenzsch M, Pohlscheidt M. Influence of Pluronic F68 on Oxygen Mass Transfer. Biotechnology Progress 2013; 29(5): 1278–1288.
Danckwerts PV. Significance of Liquid-Film Coefficients in Gas Absorption. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 1951; 43(6): 1460–1467.
Van Elk EP, Knaap MC, Versteeg GF. Application of the Penetration Theory for Gas–Liquid Mass Transfer without Liquid Bulk: Differences with Systems with a Bulk. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2007; 85(4): 516–524.
Wang C, Xu Z, Lai C, Sun X. Beyond the Standard Two-Film Theory: Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations for Carbon Dioxide Capture in a Wetted Wall Column. Chemical Engineering Science 2018; 184: 103-110.
Abe S, Okawa H, Hosokawa S, Tomiyama A. Dissolution of a Carbon Dioxide Bubble in a Vertical Pipe. Journal of Fluid Science and Technology 2008; 3(5): 667–677.
Yan X, Zheng K, Su W, Wang L, Zhang H, Cao Y, et al. Predictions of Terminal Rising Velocity, Shape and Drag Coefficient for Particle-Laden Bubbles. Minerals Engineering 2021; 173: 107188.
Al-mashhadani MKH, Wilkinson SJ, Zimmerman WB. Carbon Dioxide Rich Microbubble Acceleration of Biogas Production in Anaerobic Digestion. Chemical Engineering Science 2016; 156: 24–35.
Maceiras R, Nóvoa XR, Álvarez E, Cancela MA. Local Mass Transfer Measurements in a Bubble Column using an Electrochemical Technique. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 2007; 46(10): 1006–1011.
Mahmood RS, Alsarayreh AA, Abbas AS. Measurement and Analysis of Bubble Size Distribution in the Electrochemical Stirred Tank Reactor. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 2023; 24(1): 27–31.
Bao Y, Jia J, Tong S, Gao Z, Cai Z. Review on Single Bubble Gas–Liquid Mass Transfer. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 2020; 28(11): 2707–2722.
Waisi BI, Majeed JT, Majeed NS. Carbon Dioxide Capture using Nonwoven Activated Carbon Nanofiber. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021; 779(1): 012056.
Majeed NS, Majeed JT. Study the Performance of Nanozeolite NaA on CO2 Gas Uptake. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 2017; 18(2): 57–67.
Dhuyool AW, Shakir IK. Carbon Dioxide Capturing via a Randomly Packed Bed Scrubber using Primary and Poly Amine Absorbents. Journal of Ecological Engineering 2023; 24(11): 14–29.
Al-Hemiri A, Selman MD. Estimation of Mass Transfer Coefficents in a Packed Distillation Column using Batch Mode. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering 2011; 12(1): 13–21.
Jaber SF, Abdul wahab YM, Zboon SM. Investigation of Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Carbon Dioxide Removal in a Single Perforated Sieve Tray Column. Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies 2021; 2(2): 35–43.
Al-Hemiri AA, Salih SA. Prediction of Mass Transfer Coefficient in Bubble Column using Artificial Neural Network. Journal of Engineering 2007; 13: 1-15.
Chen PC, Huang CH, Su T, Chen HW, Yang MW, Tsao JM. Optimum Conditions for the Capture of Carbon Dioxide with a Bubble-Column Scrubber. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2015; 35: 47–55.
Liu Q, Endo H, Fukuda K, Shibahara M, Zhang P. Experimental Study on Solution and Diffusion Process of Single Carbon Dioxide Bubble in Seawater. Mechanical Engineering Journal 2016; 3(5): 16–00269.
Al-Hindi M, Azizi F. The Effect of Water Type on the Absorption and Desorption of Carbon Dioxide in Bubble Columns. Chemical Engineering Communications 2019; 207(3): 339–349.
Inkeri E, Tynjälä T. Modeling of CO2 Capture with Water Bubble Column Reactor. Energies 2020; 13(21): 5793.
Xu X, Kordorwu V, Li Z, Liu F, Wei W, Liu Z. Experimental Study on the Dynamics and Mass Transfer of CO2 Bubbles Rising in Viscoelastic Fluids. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 2021; 135: 103539.
Sa’adiyah DS, Matsuo Y, Schlüter M, Kurimoto R, Hayashi K, Tomiyama A. Effects of Chemical Absorption on Mass Transfer from Single Carbon Dioxide Bubbles in Aqueous Sodium Hydroxide Solution in a Vertical Pipe. Chemical Engineering Science 2021; 245: 116852.
Nock WJ, Heaven S, Banks JK. Mass Transfer and Gas–Liquid Interface Properties of Single CO2 Bubbles Rising in Tap Water. Chemical Engineering Science 2016; 140: 171–178.
Najim SE, Ateik AA, Haweel CK. Effect of Operating Conditions on CO2 Absorption into Aqueous Alkanol Amine Solutions in Packed Column. University of Thi-Qar Journal for Engineering Sciences 2011; 2(1): 103-117.
Atiya ZY. Estimation of Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient in Bioreactor. Al-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal 2012; 8(3): 75-80.
Gul A, Unut U. Carbon Dioxide Absorption Using Different Solvents (MEA, NaOH, KOH and Mg (OH) 2) in Bubble Column Reactor. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 2023; 12(2): 418-427.
Atzori F, Barzagli F, Varone A, Cao G, Concas A. CO2 Absorption in Aqueous NH3 Solutions: Novel Dynamic Modeling of Experimental Outcomes. Chemical Engineering Journal 2023; 415: 138999.
Álvarez E, Gómez-Díaz D, Navaza JM, Sanjurjo B. Continuous Removal of Carbon Dioxide by Absorption Employing a Bubble Column. Chemical Engineering Journal 2008; 137(2): 251–256.
Elavarasan P, Kondamudi K, Upadhyayula S. Statistical Optimization of Process Variables in Batch Alkylation of p-Cresol with tert-Butyl Alcohol using Ionic Liquid Catalyst by Response Surface Methodology. Chemical Engineering Journal 2009; 155(1–2): 355–360.
Aslan N, Cebeci Y. Application of Box–Behnken Design and Response Surface Methodology for Modeling of some Turkish Coals. Fuel 2007; 86(1–2): 90–97.
Minitab. Minitab Support. Minitab LLC 2024; 1: 1.
Mohammad AF, El-Naas MH, Suleiman MI, Al Musharfy M. Optimization of a Solvay-Based Approach for CO2 Capture. International Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications 2016; 7(4): 230-238.
Nakanoh M, Yoshida F. Gas Absorption by Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Liquids in a Bubble Column. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 1980; 19(1): 190–195.
Grice JV, Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Technometrics 2000; 42(2): 208-215.
Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) as a Tool for Optimization in Analytical Chemistry. Talanta 2008; 76(5): 965–977.
Martínez I, Casas PA. Simple Model for CO2 Absorption in a Bubbling Water Column. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 2012; 29(1): 107–111.
Wang B, Lu X, Tao S, Ren Y, Gao W, Liu X, et al. Preparation and Properties of CO2 Micro-Nanobubble Water Based on Response Surface Methodology. Applied Sciences 2021; 11(24): 11638.
Descoins C, Mathlouthi M, Le Moual M, Hennequin J. Carbonation Monitoring of Beverage in a Laboratory Scale Unit with On-Line Measurement of Dissolved CO2. Food Chemistry 2006; 95(4): 541–553.
Diamond LW, Akinfiev NN. Solubility of CO2 in Water from −1.5 to 100 °C and from 0.1 to 100 MPa: Evaluation of Literature Data and Thermodynamic Modelling. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2003; 208(1–2): 265–290.
Zedníková M, Orvalho S, Fialová M, Ruzicka MC. Measurement of Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient in Bubble Columns. ChemEngineering 2018; 2(2): 19.
Li C, Zhu C, Ma Y, Liu D, Gao X. Experimental Study on Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient of CO2 Absorption into MEA Aqueous Solution in a Rectangular Microchannel Reactor. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2014; 78: 1055–1059.