Insufficient Addressing Responses is One of The Main Reasons Behind the Rejection of Manuscripts Publishing in a High Impact Journals
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Scientific research is an important reason that indicates the progress of countries and the general scientific level. This study aims to research and verify some of the causes and obstacles that the Iraqi authors face and prevent them or lead rejection of their manuscripts from publishing in high-impact journals. Information was collected by questionnaires surveyed and some phone interviews with chief- editors of Iraqi journals subjected to the Scopus classification. The results showed that there are many reasons behind the rejection of research in high-impact journals، these reasons include several causes such as poor quality of the English language، which is known as a language of publication in Iraq for the science field، as well as the lack of experience and the inefficiency of the authors' responses on the evaluators' comments.، these were the main three reason which obstructing the publishing process of Iraqi researchers.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Plaudit
References
Thrower P. Eight reasons I rejected your article. 2012.
Donovan E E, Mackert M, Lindstadt C J, Harrison M A. What Motivates Health Communication's Peer Reviewers to Review? A Survey of Our Scholarly Community. 2020; 9: 1056-1060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1762970
Kotsis S, Chung C C. How to Submit a Revision and Tips on Being a Good Peer Reviewer. 2014; 4: 958–964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000002
Willis M. Why do peer reviewers decline to review manuscripts? A study of reviewer invitation responses. 2015; 29:5-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1006
Cristina N. How to respond to reviewers’ comments: A practical guide for authors.
Wong G L-H. Tips for Responding to Reviewers’ Comments–from an Editor’s or Reviewer’s. 2019; 13: 7-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl18361
Sorkin E M, Nahata M C. Responding to Manuscript Reviewer and Editor Comments. 2019; 9: 959-961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1060028019849941
Khanam Shazia. Dos-and-donts- for-responding-to-peer-reviewers-comments. 2013.