Using the Techniques of Decision-Making and Statistical Experiments Design in Prediction of the Random Factors Impacts on Implementation of Construction Project Plan

Main Article Content

Salim Abdulla Salih
Nizar Numan Ismail

Abstract

Accelerated development and use of decision-making technology, including the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) which has a high reliability to solve most of the uncertainty problems and meet their practical requirements, which enabled it to be used in a number of engineering and administrative applications. Statistical design of experiments technology is considered essential keys to deal with random data. Their important features enables us to combine them in a appropriate scenario to predict the prospects and rates of random factors and determine the extent of their impact on the delay for the implementation of a project.  This research verified and reach the possibility of using these two techniques in the development of mutual influence between each of random factors, a very high correlation has been proved among such factors, where the correlation coefficient between them is equal to the value (1), a mathematical models that govern random factors effects was built by using of Statistical analysis of variance (Anova) and multiple linear regression to find mathematical models that found to be had a high resolution through R2 and F tests which gave (R2 = 1, F > = 1.18E +32) results. These models are used to build a scenario to predict the expectations of potential for the disposal of these factors during the annual monthly plan, and treatment to avoid random effects on the implementation of the project and the planned completion time.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Van Uu Nguyen, M. ” Tender evaluation by fuzzy sets”, J. Construction engineering and management, ASCE, Vol. 111, No. 3, 1985, PP. 231-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1985)111:3(231)

Karia Knight, Amina R. F.,” Use of fuzzy logic for predicting design cost overruns on building projects”, J. Construction engineering and management, ASCE, Vol. 128, No. 6, 2001, PP. 503-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:6(503)

Ganoud A., Ali H. A., & Ibrahem S., ” Studying the influence of Random Factors on the planning of Building Works”, Tishreen U. J. Eng. Science Series Vol. 27, No. 3, 2005.

Saaty T. L.,” The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1980, Reprinted by RWS Publications,1996, Pittsburgh. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13033/isahp.y1996.069

Saaty T.L., 1986. Axiomatic foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, 32(7), .841-855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841

Saaty T.L., 1992. Decision making for leaders, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, USA.

Marsh et. Al. DRAFT,” Hierarchical Decision Making in Machine Design”, July, 1993.

Weng S. ,” A SCENARIO-BASED OPTIMIZATION WATER MANAGEMENT”, MSc Thesis in Env System Eng., University of Regina, Oct .2005

الخثلان, يوسف بن زيد ” نموذج تاهيل مسبق للمكاتب الإستشارية الهندسية للمشاريع الحكومية”, رسالة ماجستير, هندسة مدنية, جامعة الملك سعود, 1426 هج, 2005م

الشويع, فؤاد محمد, “تقليل الأضرار البيئية الناتجة من تراكم القمامة في أمانة العاصمة, صنعاء ومدى الإستفادة من إعادة تدويرها”, 2008

Kotulski Z. A., Szczepinsid W.,” Error Analysis with Applications in Engineering”, Springer , 1st ed., 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3570-7

Seng, L. H. ,” The selection of Construction project manager by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)”, MSc Thesis in Construction Mangement, University of Technology Malaysia,May .2006

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.