Assessment of Friction Losses and Friction Factor in Polypropylene Pipes

Main Article Content

Ahmed Abdulatif Jadoua
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4907-4526
Raad Hoobi Irzooki

Abstract

Recently, polypropylene (PPR) pipes have been increasingly used to replace galvanized iron pipes in most water transmission systems due to their ease of installation and perceived health safety. Also, PPR has engineering features that do not deteriorate over time. Despite the good properties of these pipes, there is a lack of in-depth studies on calculating the friction factor and friction losses within them. The present study calculates the friction losses in PPR pipes and the variables that influence them, whether they are associated with the pipes themselves or the internal flow properties. The experimental work was conducted using three diameters of PPR pipes: 0.0131 m, 0.01675 m, and 0.021 m, with four lengths for each diameter: 3 m, 10 m, 20 m, and 30 m. For each model, nine discharges were studied, and the head loss, for each run, was measured using pressure sensors. The number of experiments conducted was 108, and for comparison purposes, 36 experiments were conducted on a galvanized iron pipe with a diameter of 0.0171 m and the same length as the PPR pipes. The results showed that the internal surface of the PPR pipes was very smooth, with an internal roughness height of approximately 0.00001mm. The friction losses increased with flow velocity in a nonlinear relationship and pipe length in a linear relationship, where the rate of increase in friction losses was 9.75 times when the pipe length increased from 3 to 30m. The friction losses decreased with the pipe diameter in a linear relationship, with a 40% decrease observed when the pipe diameter increased from 0.0131 m to 0.01675 m for a 30 m long pipe and a flow velocity of 1.53 m/s. The percentage of losses decreased by 55% when the diameter increased from 0.0131 m to 0.021 m. Regarding low flow velocity, 0.380 m/s, the decrease was very small compared to high velocities, as the percentage of decrease does not exceed 17% when the diameter increases from 0.0131m to 0.021m. The results also showed that the friction losses in PPR pipes were approximately 20% lower than those in galvanized iron pipes.

Article Details

Section
Articles

Plaudit

References

Esposito A. Fluid Mechanics with Applications. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey; 1990.

Brick D, Parks P. Colebrook’s Flow Friction Explicit Approximations Based on Fixed-Point Iterative Cycles and Symbolic Regression. Computation 2019; 7(3): 48.

Kanoosh AA, Khaleel EH, Mohammed-Ali WS. The Resilience of Numerical Applications to Design Drinking Water Networks. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 2023; 18(5): 1069–1075.

Chanson H. Applied Hydrodynamics: An Introduction to Ideal and Real Fluid Flows. CRC Press; 2009.

Al-Watania Plastic. Polypropylene Rondom Piping System Catalog. Al-Watania Plastic Industries; Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Meddah HM, Selini N, Benguediab M, Mohamed MB, Belhamiani M. Analysis of the Polypropylene Mechanical Behaviour Response: Experiments and Numerical Modeling. Materials & Design 2009; 30(10): 4192–4199.

Ouardi A, Mouhib N, Wahid A, ELghorba M. Comparative Study of Axial and Circumferential Defects Severity on the Failure of Polypropylene (PPR) Pipes. Engineering Failure Analysis 2019; 105: 1201–1211.

Zheng J, Zhang J, Xu J, Liu C, Xu L. Experiment on Frost Heave Failure Mechanism of PPR Water Pipe. Engineering Failure Analysis 2020; 117: 104831.

Wu Y, Ge Q, Yang F, Wu T, Xiang M. Improving the Low-Temperature Toughness of PPR Pipe by Compounding with PERT. Journal of Polymer Research 2021; 28(7): 241.

Ramadan I, Tanase M. Experimental Study Regarding the Mechanical Behavior of PPR Pipes. Materiale Plastice 2022; 59(2): 32–39.

Ahmed AM, Seedahmed A, Ali TM. Estimate Friction Factor for Polypropylene Pipes. Engineering and Technology Journal 2022; 7(9): 1467–1470.

Abdalla AM, Shably MS, Mustafa TY. Estimation Polypropylene Elbow Losses. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances 2022; 12(1): 147–150.

Rakhimov K, Melikuziyev S, Sultanov R. Coefficient of Hydraulic Friction of Plastic Pipes. E3S Web of Conferences 2023; 401: 01042.

Zhao R, Chen J, Liu J, Li M, Yang H. Anti-Scaling Performances of Different Aged Landfill Leachates on PPR and ABS Pipe Materials. Water Science and Technology 2023; 87(2): 366–380.

Shabani S, Fattah KP, Mortula MM. Evaluation of Trihalomethanes Formation in Polymeric Pipes within Water Distribution System. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology 2023; 15(4): 435–448.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.