Comparison of Nitrogen and Phosphate Compounds Removal Efficiency Between Batch and Sequencing Batch System

Main Article Content

Zena Fakhri Ismaeel Al-Hashimi

Abstract

Phosphate and nitrogen compounds considered as an important pollutions that due to feed lakes and slow motion river with algae . hospital effluents considered as a sample for study because it have high rate of nutrients, the paper used two reactor ,the first working under batch system ,the second working under sequencing batch system during circle time of 24 hr for the both reactor.The study made comparison between two reactor on the removal efficiency of phosphate and nitrogen compounds. The results have shown that phosphate removal in sequencing batch reactor(SBR) more than its removal in batch reactor .The heights value of removal achieved after 12hr of reaction in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) .The removal efficiency was between (40-82)% and its between (20- 62)% in batch reactor .Ammonia removal increased as organic load decreased and the removal efficiency increased in sequencing batch system . The heights value of removal achieved after 16 hr of reaction and its approximately substantiate. The removal efficiency of ammonia in (SBR) was between (96-98)%and its between (90- 95)% in batch reactor. The nitrate removal happened only at sedimentation time at the end of reaction in batch reactor but in (SBR) Anoxic condition assisted on the removal of nitrate and its due to rise the pH value of effluents.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

Section
Articles

Plaudit

References

عبــاوي, ســعاد عبــد و حســن, محمد ســليمان (الهندســة العمليــة للبيئــة-فحوصــات المــاء) دار الكتب والطباعة والنشر جامعة الموصل (1984

Gaudy,a.f & Yang,p.y “Nitrogen metabolism in extended aeration processes operated with and without pretreatment ” J.WPCF,16,1, (1984)

Kiely,Gerdar”Environmental engineering “,:McGraw Hill published company , England(1997).

Gaudy ,A.F&Gaudy,E.T ” Micobiology for environmental Scientists &Engineering ” “,:McGraw Hill ,Inc.,New York ,USA(1980).

Jones ,W.L &Wilderer,P.A &Schroder,E.D “Operation of three stage SBR system for nitrogen removal from SBR ” J.Environ.Stud.,no (1),15-20,Issn,pp1230-1485,(2001)

Winkler, M.A ” Biological treatment of waste water ” 1st ,Ellis Horwood Ltd. England (1981).

Cliford,W.R &Paul, H.K ” Mechanism of activated sludge phosphate release and method of control ” (1979) Virginea.

Manning,G.F&Irvine,R.L”The biological removal of Phophorus in sequencing batch reactor ” J.WPCF,vol.57,no.1`,pp87-94 (1985).

Palis,J.C &Irvine,R.L “Nitrogen removal in low loaded single, tank sequencing batch reactor”J .WPCF vol.57,no 1, pp(82-86)(1985).

Allerman ,J.E &Sweeney,M.W&Kamber, D.M “Automation of batch waste water treatment system using programable logic controllers ” Wat. Sci. Tech.,vol 21,pp (1271-1282) (1989). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1989.0325

عباس, وعــد محمــود (اســتخدام احــواض الجرعــة المتتابعــة فــي معالجــة ميــاه فضــلات المستشفيات) اطروحة ماجستير, جامعة الموصل / كلية الهندسة (2002)

Cheo,J &Dae,S.L&Jong, M.P” Microbial communises in activated sludge preforming enhanced” water research ,73,2195-2205(2003).

Peter,A &Sin,G &Insel,G “Optimal butrobust nitrogen and phosphor removal in SBR”Std. Oper. Scie. (2004).

محمـود, طـارق احمـد (علـم وتكنولوجيـا البيئـة ) دار الكتـب والطباعـة والنشـر , جامعـة الموصل (1990

APHA,AWWA,WPCF “Standard method for examination of water and wastewater ” 16th, Washington D.C,USA(1985).

Irvine ,R.L&Ketchum, L.H “Municiple application of SBR treatment “J.WPCF vol 155,no.5,484-488 (1983).

Schroder,E.D &Silverstain,J” Control of activated sludge setlling in an SBR” national conference of engineering ,ASCE,pp 377- 384.(1983).

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.