Numerical Exploration and Optimisation on Pullout Capacity Behaviour for Under-Reamed Piles in Dry and Partially Saturated Sand
Main Article Content
Abstract
The pullout capacity behaviour of straight and underreamed piles in two soil layers was investigated in the current work using Plaxis 3D 2020. The layered soil includes one layer of homogeneous sand, dense sand topped with stiff clay, and stiff clay topped with dense sand. The piles were selected per the Indian Code Specification (IS 2911). To depict the impact of bulb numbers and their positions on the ultimate pullout load of the pile, three types of large-scale concrete pile models were employed: uniform pile shaft (SP), pile with one bulb (SURP), and pile with two bulbs (DURP). Under-reamed piles measure 0.3 m in stem diameter by 4.5 m in height, with a bulb diameter of 0.75 m. The relative density of the soil is varied to understand its impact on pile behaviour, with the internal friction angle (φ) in sand varying between 30 and 39 degrees. In this regard, the soil was assumed to obey Mohr-Coulomb's failure criteria. The findings revealed that multiple under-reams led to more soil-structure interactions, resulting in increased mobilisation of soil resistance. Compared with a conventional pile under identical conditions, a single under-ream increased the ultimate pullout pile load by about 3.5 times. For the double under-ream, it was increased by about 4times. For all types of piles, the ultimate pullout load of a pile embedded in dry sand is often greater than that fixed in fully or partially moist soil. The ultimate pullout carrying capacity was the largest when the two under-reamed piles were embedded in stiff clay resting on dense sand, rather than in dense sand in the top layer or in a single layer of homogeneous dense sand.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
References
Tomlinson M, Woodward J. Pile Design and Construction Practice. CRC Press 2007.
Xie XY, Yin XS. The Finite Element Analysis of Plate's Distance on Push-Extend Multi-Under-Reamed Pile. Advanced Materials Research 2012; 468: 2517-2520.
Harris DE, Madabhushi GSP. Uplift Capacity of an Under-Reamed Pile Foundation. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering 2015; 168(6): 526-538.
Kumar A, Khatri VN, Gupta SK. Numerical and Analytical Study on Uplift Capacity of Under-Reamed Piles in Sand. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology 2022; 40(1): 104-124.
Patra NR, Deograthias M, James M. Pullout Capacity of Anchor Piles. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 2004; 2004-0340.
Al-Neami MA, Wasmi M. Influence of Cyclic Loading on Performance of Steel Piles in Sandy Soil. MATEC Web of Conferences 2018; 162: 01012.
Nasr A, Azzam W, Abd Elgwad A. Experimental Study of Enlarged Base Pile under Tension Load in Sand. Journal of Engineering Research 2022; 6(2): 40-44.
Nazir R, Moayedi H, Pratikso A, Mosallanezhad M. The Uplift Load Capacity of an Enlarged Base Pier Embedded in Dry Sand. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 2015; 8: 7285-7296.
Farokhi AS, Alielahi H, Mardani Z. Optimising the Performance of Under-Reamed Piles in Clay Using Numerical Method. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 2014; 19(G): 1507-1520.
Al-Tememy MS, Al-Neami MA, Aswad MF. Finite Element Analysis on Behavior of Single Battered Pile in Sandy Soil under Pullout Loading. International Journal of Engineering 2022; 35(6): 1127-1134.
Al-Bayati AW, Al-Neami MA, Rahil FH. Experimental Work on the Effect of Under-Reamed Pile Geometry on the Pullout Capacity of Sand. International Journal of Engineering 2023.
Alhassani AMJ. Analysis of Under-Reamed Piles Subjected to Different Types of Loads in Clayey Soil. International Journal of Engineering 2021; 34(8): 1940-1948.
Deb T, Pal SK. Study on the Uplift Behavior and Failure Pattern of Single Belled Anchor with 3D and 2D Models in Cohesionless Soil Bed. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering 2019; 43: 327-343.
Sakr M, Nasr A, Basha A, Khaffaf M. Comparative Study on the Behavior of Under-Reamed Piles under Vertical Uplift Loads in Sand. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology 2022; 9(1): 28-44.
Sakrp M, Nasr A, Basha A, Khaffaf M. Experimental and Analytical Assessment of the Pullout Capacity of Axially Loaded Under-Reamed Pile in Cohesionless Soil. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 2023; 8(1): 73.
Mohammed AA. Investigation of Sampling Error on Soil Testing Results. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology 2018; 9(13): 579-589.
Waterman D. Structural Elements and Excavations. Presentation in CG1 Chile 2006.
Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 2911 (Part IV): Design and Construction of Pile Foundation Code of Practice, Load Test on Piles. New Delhi, India 2010.
Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 2911 (Part III): Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Pile Foundations, Underreamed Piles. New Delhi, India 1980.
Dickin EA, Leung CF. Performance of Piles with Enlarged Bases Subject to Uplift Forces. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1990; 27(5): 546-556.
Schafer M, Madabhushi SPG. Uplift Resistance of Enlarged Base Pile Foundations. Indian Geotechnical Journal 2020; 50: 426-441.