Experimental Investigation on the Fatigue Behavior on Honeycomb Sandwich Composite Panels
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper aims to study the dynamic behaviors of particular sandwich panels manufactured using three specifications of aluminum honeycomb core with fiberglass or aluminum face-sheet materials. Three groups of panels were designed and manufactured, each including three different sorts of samples, all fabricated with the same thickness. A cantilever fatigue test was conducted on specimens, and the results were collected and presented in curves to detect the factors that affect the panel's endurance. The finding showed that the specimens with aluminum skin had more probability of face-sheet/core delamination. Samples of fiberglass covers showed face-sheets cracks or cores cracks more than delamination failure, while samples of epoxy-filled cores experienced the specimen’s global crack. Generally, specimens with aluminum covers and epoxy-filled cores resisted fatigue load more than other specimens. The larger honeycomb cell-size specimens showed more probability to face-sheet/core delamination failures than samples with smaller cell-size cores.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Plaudit
References
Ngo TD. Introduction to Composite Materials. Composite and Nanocomposite Materials—From Knowledge to Industrial Applications (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91285
A. K. Kaw and F. Group, Composite. 2006.
Wu Y, Liu Q, Fu J, Li Q, Hui D. Dynamic Crash Responses of Bio-Inspired Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Structures with CFRP Panels. Composites Part B: Engineering 2017; 121: 122-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.030
Twfek KG, Mansour EA. Theoretical and Experimental Analysis for Performance of Wind Turbine. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences 2020; 27(4): 114-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.27.4.12
Bedewi A, Yahia YI, Abdulla AI. Structural Behavior of Hollow Beam Reinforced with Different types of GFRP stirrups. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences 2023; 30(1): 72-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.30.1.7
Castanie B, Bouvet C, Ginot M. Review of Composite Sandwich Structure in Aeronautic Applications. Composites Part C 2020; 1: 100004, (1-25). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100004
Wang Z, Li Z, Zhou W, Hui D. On the Influence of Structural Defects for Honeycomb Structure. Composites Part B 2018; 142: 183–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.015
Jen YM, Chang LY. Effect of Thickness of Face Sheet on the Bending Fatigue Strength of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Beams. Engineering Failure Analysis 2009; 16(4): 1282-1293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.08.004
Abbadi A, Tixier C, Gilgert J, Azari Z. Experimental Study on the Fatigue Behaviour of Honeycomb Sandwich Panels with Artificial Defects. Composite Structures 2015; 120: 394–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.020
Belingardi G, Martella P, Peroni L. Fatigue Analysis of Honeycomb-Composite Sandwich Beams Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2007; 38(4): 1183–1191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.007
Shipsha A, Burman M, Zenkert D. On Mode I Fatigue Crack Growth in Foam Core Materials for Sandwich Structures. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials 2000; 2(2):103–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1106/K8KT-3UM8-FBD6-4NXK
Shipsha B. Zenkert. Interfacial Fatigue Crack Growth in Foam Core Sandwich Structures. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 1999; 22(2):123–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00148.x
Zenkert D, Burman M. Failure Mode Shifts During Constant Amplitude Fatigue Loading of GFRP/Foam Core Sandwich Beams. International Journal of Fatigue 2011; 33(2):217–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.005
Clark SD, Shenoi RA, Allen HG. Modelling the Fatigue Behaviour of Sandwich Beams under Monotonic, 2- Step and Block-Loading Regimes. Composites Science and Technology 1999; 59(4):471–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00088-8
Abbadi A, Azari Z, Belouettar S, Gilgert J, Freres P. Modelling the Fatigue Behaviour of Composites Honeycomb Materials (Aluminium/ Aramide Fibre Core) using Four-Point Bending Tests. International Journal of Fatigue 2010; 32(11):1739–1747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.005
Wu X, Yu H, Guo L, Zhang L, Sun X, Chai Z. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Static and Fatigue Behaviors of Composites Honeycomb Sandwich Structure. Composite Structures 2019; 213, 165-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.081
Palomba G, Crupi V, Epasto G. Collapse Modes of Aluminium Honeycomb Sandwich Structures under Fatigue Bending Loading. Thin-Walled Structures 2019; 145: 106363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106363
Demelio G, Genovese K, Pappalettere C. An Experimental Investigation of Static and Fatigue Behaviour of Sandwich Composite Panels Joined by Fasteners. Composites Part B: Engineering 2001; 32(4):299–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00007-5
Jen YM, Teng FL, Teng TC. Two-Stage Cumulative Bending Fatigue Behavior for the Adhesively Bonded Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Panels. Materials & Design (1980-2015) 2014; 54: 805-813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.010
Ma M, Yao W, Jiang W, Jin W, Chen Y, Li P. A Multi-Area Fatigue Damage Model Of Composite Honeycomb Sandwich Panels Under Three-Point Bending Load. Composite Structures 2021; 261: 113603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113603
Shi SS, Sun Z, Hu XZ, Chen HR. Carbon-Fiber and Aluminum-Honeycomb Sandwich Composites with and Without Kevlar-Fiber Interfacial Toughening. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2014; 67: 102-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.017
Shi S, Sun Z, Hu X, Chen H. Flexural Strength and Energy Absorption of Carbon -Fiber– Aluminum-Honeycomb Composite Sandwich Reinforced by Aluminum Grid. Thin-Walled Structures 2014; 84: 416-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2014.07.015
Abdul-Kareem HS, Abdulla FA, Abdulrazzaq MA. Effect of Shot Peening and Solidification on Fatigue Properties of Epoxy Base Composite Material. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2019; 518(3):032017, (1-14). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/518/3/032017
Ogaili AAF, Al-Ameen ES, Abdulla FA. An Experimental Study for Different Types of Natural Fiber Reinforced Composite Material. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN) 2019; 7(4): 1698–1709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i4.837
Abdulla FA. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Shot-Peening and Solidification Effects on the Endurance Limit of Composite Material. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2020;881(1):012058, (1-12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/881/1/012058
Al-Ameen ES, Abdulla FA, Ogaili AAF. Effect of Nano TiO2 on Static Fracture Toughness of Fiberglass /Epoxy Composite Materials in Hot Climate Regions. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2020; 870(1):012170, (1-10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/870/1/012170