Comparative Analysis of the Efficiency of SAGD and CSS Thermal Methods Based on Mathematical Calculations
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The production of heavy oil reserves has become increasingly important in recent years, as conventional oil sources become scarcer. However, extracting heavy oil is hindered by its high viscosity. One technique that has proven to be effective for heavy oil recovery is Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD). SAGD is a thermal recovery method that facilitates oil. In this article, we examine the main advantages of SAGD over other production methods, including higher RF, higher heating efficiency, higher production rate, lower steam-oil ratio, higher energy return on investment, better reservoir pressure maintenance, and lower environmental impact. Quantitatively, our calculations indicate that SAGD achieved a recovery factor of 39% versus 31% for CSS, with a steam–oil ratio of 2.56 versus 5.40 and an energy return on investment of 0.39 versus 0.20, respectively. Overall, these results demonstrate that SAGD outperforms CSS in recovery efficiency, energy utilisation, and environmental performance.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
References
Santos RG, Loh W, Bannwart AC, Trevisam OV. An Overview of Heavy Oil Properties and Their Recovery and Transportation Methods. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 2014; 31(3): 571–590.
Meyer RF, Attanasi ED. Heavy Oil and Natural Bitumen: Strategic Petroleum Resources. United States Geological Survey USGS 2003.
Ali MA, Nofal WA. Application of High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for Hydrocarbon Group Type Analysis of Crude Oils. Fuel Science and Technology International 1994; 12: 21–33.
Lanier D. Heavy Oil – A Significant Energy Source for the 21st Century. UNITAR Centre for Heavy Crude and Tar Sands 1998; 1998: 039.
Butler RM. A New Approach to the Modelling of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 1985; 24(3): 42–51.
Butler RM. Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage: Concept, Development, Performance and Future. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 1994; 33(2): 44–50.
Donaldson EC, Chilingarian EV, Yen TF. Enhanced Oil Recovery I – Fundamentals and Analyses. Elsevier Science Publishing, Amsterdam; 1985.
Filina OA, Konyukhov VY, Makarov AA. Improvement of Operational Reliability of Units and Elements of Dump Trucks Taking into Account the Least Reliable Elements of the System. World Electric Vehicle Journal 2024; 15: 365.
Green DW, Willhite GP. Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE Textbook Series, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, USA; 1998.
Alvarado V, Manrique E. Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Updated Review. Energies 2010; 3: 1529–1575.
Butler RM. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA; 1991.
Van Poolen HK. Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery. Pennwell Publishers, Tulsa, USA; 1981.
Pogrebnoy AV, Efremenkov EA, Valuev DV, Boltrushevich AE. Improving the Reliability of Current Collectors in Electric Vehicles. Mathematics 2025; 13: 2022.
Scott GR. Comparison of CSS and SAGD Performance in the Clearwater Formation at Cold Lake. SPE/Petroleum Society of CIM/CHOA Thermal Operation and Heavy Oil Symposium 2002.
Bybee K. Comparison of Cyclic Steam Stimulation and Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. Journal of Petroleum Technology 2015; 55(6): 68–69.
Tattimbek G, Sherov KT, Absadykov BN, Sikhimbayev MR. Study the Method of Thermal Frictional Treatment of Tooth Gap for Large-Modular Cylindrical Gears. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories 2025; 17(1): 350–361.
Klyuev RV, Yegorova EV, Bosikov II, Tsidaev BS. Evaluation of the Use of Effective Technologies for Increasing the Sustainable Development of the Natural and Technical Systems of the Oil and Gas Complex. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories 2018; 10(3): 392–403.
Batuhtina IY, Batuhtin AG, Baranovskaja MG. Mathematical Modelling of Mass Transfer of Dust-Air Mixture to Increase the Solid Fuel Combustion Efficiency. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories 2024; 16(4): 1438–1449.
Shayganpour F. Comparison of CSS and SAGD in Cold Lake. Department of Chemical Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; 2015.
Malozyomov BV, Martyushev NV, Babyr NV, Pogrebnoy AV, Efremenkov EA, Valuev DV, Boltrushevich AE. Modelling of Reliability Indicators of a Mining Plant. Mathematics 2024; 12: 2842.
Irani M, Ghannadi S. Understanding the Heat-Transfer Mechanism in the Steam-Assisted Gravity-Drainage (SAGD) Process and Comparing the Conduction and Convection Flux in Bitumen Reservoirs. SPE Journal 2013; 18(1): 134–145.
Irani M, Gates I. Understanding the Convection Heat-Transfer Mechanism in the Steam-Assisted Gravity-Drainage (SAGD) Process. SPE Journal 2013; 18(6): 1202–1215.
Mijura K, Wang J. An Analytical Model to Predict Cumulative Steam/Oil Ratio (CSOR) in Thermal-Recovery SAGD Process. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 2010; 51(4): 268–275.
Ghanabari E, Mighani S, Shaabani E, Alipour R. Improving SAGD Performance by Combining with CSS. Amirkabir University of Technology 2011.